I am looking at divorce cases in Canada and came across this.
In Babineau v Babineau (4 DLR 951), a 1924 New Brunswick (Canada) case, a wife tried to get a divorce on the grounds of bestiality of which, the Court said, "there is abundant evidence".
But the Court reluctantly concluded that as grounds for a divorce, adultery does not include bestiality.
The Court took the unusual initiative to conclude its judgment in these words:
ok i just saw this, and this is why the ex is trying not to divorce me either.
He applied for access or visitation and that mean he said he had a bond with my child, not his bio child.
A recent court ruling in Court In ontario showed a women knew her twins were not her husbands but from another man via an extramarital affair. So despite a dna test the children were deemed chldren of the marriage from a 99 supreme court ruling in Canada.
Husband knew tihs and he still filed for acces to my child.
In many US states the same rule applies. A friends daughter got pregnant and was on medicaid but still legally married to another men who refused divorce and because of that he had to pay for her medical bills but finally divorced her.
Everytime I find Mr Right my husband scares him away. - Submitted by Nancy Albers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam and Eve had an ideal marriage. He didn't have to hear about all the men she could have married, and she didn't have to hear about the way his mother cooked. - Submitted by Lois Misiewicz
Caracciolo v. Ruberto, 2010 ONSC 525 (CanLII) — 2010-01-21
Superior Court of Justice — Ontario
husband — wife — property — valuation — matrimonial home
The case that the standard now in Ont.
Went through so many law books last night my eyes are go…